ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo

serie

Editorial

 

ISBN

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo

Editorial

 

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo

Tipo : Ley Decreto Norma Resolucion Circular Directiva

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo

Autor como conferencia

Paginas

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo

 

Año de publicación

Producción de publicación

Volumen

ISBN

Frecuencia

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo videos

Año de publicación

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Adjunte la Imagen del Video

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2020/09000/outcomes_based_selection_into_medical_school_.48.aspx

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1999

Titulo

Titulo Revista

ISSN

Año de publicación Suplemento

Numero: Volumen

Pagina Inicial Pagina Final

Resumen
Purpose Medical school selection committees aim to identify the best possible students and, ultimately, the best future doctors from a large, well-qualified, generally homogeneous pool of applicants. Constructive alignment of medical school selection, curricula, and assessment with the ultimate outcomes (e.g., CanMEDS roles) has been proposed as means to attain this goal. Whether this approach is effective has not yet been established. The authors addressed this gap by assessing the relationship between performance in an outcomes-based selection procedure and performance during the clinical years of medical school. Method Two groups of students were compared: (1) those admitted into Maastricht University Medical School via an outcomes-based selection procedure and (2) those rejected through this procedure who were admitted into the program through a national, grade-point-average-based lottery. The authors compared performance scores of students from the 2 groups on all 7 CanMEDS roles, using assessment data gathered during clinical rotations. The authors examined data from 3 cohorts (2011–2013). Results Students admitted through the local, outcomes-based selection procedure significantly outperformed the initially rejected but lottery-admitted students in all years, and the differences between groups increased over time. The selected students performed significantly better in the CanMEDS roles of Communicator, Collaborator, and Professional in the first year of clinical rotations; in these 3 roles—plus Organizer—in the second year; and in 2 additional roles (Advocate and Scholar—all except Medical Expert) at the end of their clinical training.

 

Base de datos bibliográfica Base de datos bibliográfica Seleccione una Access Medicine Biblioteca VirtualenSalud(BVS) Cochrane Central Dialnet Lilacs-Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud Medline-PubMed Redalyc ScienceDirect SciELO-Scientific Electronic Library Online WHOLIS Otra

Imagen de portada

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores