ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo

serie

Editorial

 

ISBN

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo

Editorial

 

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo

Tipo : Ley Decreto Norma Resolucion Circular Directiva

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo

Autor como conferencia

Paginas

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo

 

Año de publicación

Producción de publicación

Volumen

ISBN

Frecuencia

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo videos

Año de publicación

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Adjunte la Imagen del Video

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

https://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10266

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1707

Titulo

Titulo Revista

ISSN

Año de publicación Suplemento

Numero: Volumen

Pagina Inicial Pagina Final

Resumen
Introduction: There is growing agreement that physician advocacy is important and is a part of medical professionalism. The specialty societies of internal medicine and pediatrics include advocacy as part of professional responsibilities, and it is currently becoming integrated in residency education and training. The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. The elements of this multidimensional curriculum may be used together or separately based on the needs of the learners and the institutional resources available. Methods: In a modified flipped-classroom approach, students are given readings to complete prior to small group sessions of 8 to 15 students. Students are expected to contribute to the learning occurring in the small group session through dialogue, discussion, and group project work. Students are then given assignments to apply the curriculum in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings. Results: Two medical school classes (approximately 180 students) have completed this curriculum at this time. We asked students to evaluate the effectiveness of this curriculum on their learning with a pre− and postcurricula self-assessment. Using a five-point Likert scale, students were asked to rate their skill level with each objective (1 = unfamiliar/never used it; 5 = use with ease). Students were given the same self-assessment before and after the coursework. Seventy-eight students responded to the precourse survey. Fifty students responded to the postcourse survey. Average reported skill level increased by at least 0.4 points for all skill levels. Notably, in the precourse survey, students rated their skill level lowest in identifying resources and collaborating for system change (2.3 and 2.0, respectively). These also were the skills that students rated themselves as most improved at (increase in 0.60 and 0.76 Likert points, respectively) on the postcourse survey. Discussion: The purpose of this resource is to provide learners with an introduction to social determinants of health and patient advocacy. This curriculum has been implemented and evaluated for medical students, but it is broadly applicable to interprofessional students and residents in health-related fields. It includes an interprofessional practice component.

 

Base de datos bibliográfica Base de datos bibliográfica Seleccione una Access Medicine Biblioteca VirtualenSalud(BVS) Cochrane Central Dialnet Lilacs-Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud Medline-PubMed Redalyc ScienceDirect SciELO-Scientific Electronic Library Online WHOLIS Otra

Imagen de portada

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Gestion curricular Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores