ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo

serie

Editorial

 

ISBN

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo

Editorial

 

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo

Tipo : Ley Decreto Norma Resolucion Circular Directiva

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo

Autor como conferencia

Paginas

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo

 

Año de publicación

Producción de publicación

Volumen

ISBN

Frecuencia

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo videos

Año de publicación

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Adjunte la Imagen del Video

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

https://www.mededportal.org/doi/full/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10235

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1698

Titulo

Titulo Revista

ISSN

Año de publicación Suplemento

Numero: Volumen

Pagina Inicial Pagina Final

Resumen
This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and application to health sciences education for the Penn State Questionnaire of Professionalism (PSQP); and (2) a copy of the PSQP, scoring key, and manual developed by George F. Blackall, PsyD, MBA, Steven A. Melnick, PhD, and Glenda H. Shoop, PhD. The PSQP is designed to assess attitudes toward professionalism in medical students, residents, clinical faculty, and biomedical sciences faculty on four parallel professionalism questionnaires, with each population receiving their own distinct version. The professionalism questionnaires are a set of self-reported assessments with 5-point Likert-scales anchored from low to high, and respondents choose from a range of responses (never, little, some, much, great deal) for each question. There are 36 items on the professionalism questionnaires representing six a priori dimensions adopted from the American Board of Internal Medicine. These dimensions are labeled: Accountability, Altruism, Duty, Excellence, Honesty and Integrity, and Respect. Participants are invited to rate the extent to which statements describing the behavioral conduct of others reflects their definition of professionalism. The PSQP has also been reliably administered across multiple samples of diverse medical student populations. While the PSQP has strong internal validity evidence, and good support for the factor structure of the instrument, there are areas of concerns. The first concern is that the anchors to the Likert-type scale are very different from the standard agree to disagree, or other anchor formats commonly found in other measures. This calls to question whether participant responses are at all impacted by the novel anchor system. The other concern is that it isn't clear how to interpret high and low scores on the PSQP. The authors do not address whether higher scores on the PSQP means that participants have a stronger definition of professionalism and are therefore more professional, or what it may mean to score low or high in general. Further research should consider gathering additional validity and reliability evidence by administering the PSQP to the intended target populations across multiple samples. Overall, the PSQP is a good assessment tool worth administering.

 

Base de datos bibliográfica Base de datos bibliográfica Seleccione una Access Medicine Biblioteca VirtualenSalud(BVS) Cochrane Central Dialnet Lilacs-Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud Medline-PubMed Redalyc ScienceDirect SciELO-Scientific Electronic Library Online WHOLIS Otra

Imagen de portada

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Evaluacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores