ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo

serie

Editorial

 

ISBN

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo

Editorial

 

Año de publicación Edición Primera Segunda Tercera Cuarta Quita Sexta Septima Octava Novena Decima Selecione una

Paginas Existencias 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

Signatura topografica:

ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo

Tipo : Ley Decreto Norma Resolucion Circular Directiva

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo

Autor como conferencia

Paginas

 

Año de publicación

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo

 

Año de publicación

Producción de publicación

Volumen

ISBN

Frecuencia

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo videos

Año de publicación

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Adjunte la Imagen del Video

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X22000270?via%3Dihub

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores

 

ID Consecutivo : 1561

Titulo

Titulo Revista

ISSN

Año de publicación Suplemento

Numero: Volumen

Pagina Inicial Pagina Final

Resumen
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods

 

Base de datos bibliográfica Base de datos bibliográfica Seleccione una Access Medicine Biblioteca VirtualenSalud(BVS) Cochrane Central Dialnet Lilacs-Literatura Latinoamericana en Ciencias de la Salud Medline-PubMed Redalyc ScienceDirect SciELO-Scientific Electronic Library Online WHOLIS Otra

Imagen de portada

Adjunte la portada del libro Si no tiene una imagen, descargue aqui la imagen de Ascofame

 

Idioma Español Inglés Portugués Francés Alemán

 

Tipo de Acceso

Restringido(ASCOFAME)

Libre

Registrado

Palabras clave

Coleccion ASCOFAME: Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional continuo Gestion curricular Calidad y acreditacion Evaluacion Investigacion Desarrollo Profesional

Disponibilidad:	Digital	Físico	Físico y Digital	Link Externo

Cargue el Documento

Ingrese el Link: ejemplo: http://www.google.com.co

 

Publico	Pregrado	Posgrado	Decanatura
Objetivo:	Docentes	Médicos	Investigadores
	Clínicos	Educadores Médicos	Otros profesionales de la salud
	Evaluadores