Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Resumen:
administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. Materials and methods: We searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students.
Fecha de publicación:
2018.
Autores :
Wen Zeng;
Qin Zhang;
Xue Jia ;
Autor corporativo:
Medicine,
Editores:
Medline-PubMed ;
Signatura Topográfica:
43
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
0
ISBN:
1536-5964
Existencias:
0
Palabras claves:
Lecture-based Learning
Medical Education
Problem-based Learning
Meta-analysis
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Resumen:
administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. Materials and methods: We searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students.
Fecha de publicación:
2018.
Autores :
Wen Zeng;
Qin Zhang;
Xue Jia ;
Autor corporativo:
Medicine,
Editores:
Medline-PubMed ;
Signatura Topográfica:
43
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
0
Existencias:
0
Palabras claves:
Lecture-based Learning
Medical Education
Problem-based Learning
Meta-analysis
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Resumen:
administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. Materials and methods: We searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students.
Autores:
Wen Zeng
,
Qin Zhang
,
Xue Jia
,
.
Titulo Revista:
Medicine,
.
Numero:
43
Volumen:
97
Fecha de publicación:
2018.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Medline-PubMed ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
0
Página Final:
0
ISBN:
1536-5964
Palabras claves:
Lecture-based Learning
Medical Education
Problem-based Learning
Meta-analysis
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Medline-PubMed :
Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Resumen:
administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. Materials and methods: We searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students.
Autores :
Wen Zeng;
Qin Zhang;
Xue Jia ;
Autor corporativo:
Medicine,
Fecha de publicación:
2018.
Tipo :
Medline-PubMed .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Lecture-based Learning
Medical Education
Problem-based Learning
Meta-analysis
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Medline-PubMed :
Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Resumen:
administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. Materials and methods: We searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students.
Autores :
Wen Zeng;
Qin Zhang;
Xue Jia ;
Autor corporativo:
Medicine,
Fecha de publicación:
2018.
Paginas:
0.
ISBN:
1536-5964 .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Lecture-based Learning
Medical Education
Problem-based Learning
Meta-analysis
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Resumen:
administration of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) teaching models in Chinese medical education. Materials and methods: We searched the following Chinese electronic databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science Periodical Database, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. We also searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Search Engine. We searched for published studies involving the combined administration of PBL+LBL teaching models in Chinese medical education. All randomized controlled trials were included. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of knowledge scores, skill scores, medical writing scores, comprehensive ability scores and teaching satisfaction. A subgroup analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 23 RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 2589 medical students. The PBL+LBL teaching model significantly increased knowledge scores (95% CI, 2.85-5.78; P < .00001), skill scores (95% CI, 0.51-3.71; P = .01), medical writing scores (95% CI, 1.04-4.04; P = .0009), comprehensive ability scores (95% CI, 2.04-8.71; P = .002) and teaching satisfaction (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.10-1.59; P = .003) compared with the LBL teaching model alone. Additionally, a subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effect of PBL+LBL on knowledge scores, medical writing scores, and comprehensive ability scores when comparing practical and theoretical courses. Another subgroup analysis that looked at the level of training showed that the PBL+LBL teaching model also significantly improved the knowledge scores of Freshman, Sophomore, Junior, Senior and Masters students.
Fecha de publicación:
2018.
Autor corporativo:
Medicine,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Lecture-based Learning
Medical Education
Problem-based Learning
Meta-analysis
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Wen Zeng; Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(2018). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=2084
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Wen Zeng Qin Zhang Xue Jia Wen Zeng Qin Zhang Xue Jia Combined administration of problem- and lecture-based learning teaching models in medical education in China: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2018; 97Ed. 0.
