Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Resumen:
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and practice. Compared to no learning, pure e-learning improves EBHC knowledge and skills but not attitudes and behaviour. Pure e-learning is no better than face-to-face learning in improving any of the primary outcomes. Blended learning is better than no learning for improving EBHC knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; and is better than face-to-face learning in improving attitudes and behaviour. Compared to pure e-learning, blended learning improves EBHC knowledge. It is not clear which elearning components are most effective in improving outcomes. However, the included studies were of moderate to low quality, with a small number of studies included in each analysis, and imprecision and inconsistency of results in all comparisons. These shortcomings need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autores :
Nkengafac Villyen Motaze;
Eva Rehfuess;
Taryn Young;
Anke Rohwer;
Autor corporativo:
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
Editores:
Otra ;
Signatura Topográfica:
1
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
ISBN:
1891-1803
Existencias:
147
Palabras claves:
E-learning
Systematicr Review
Evidence-based Health
Medical Education
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Resumen:
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and practice. Compared to no learning, pure e-learning improves EBHC knowledge and skills but not attitudes and behaviour. Pure e-learning is no better than face-to-face learning in improving any of the primary outcomes. Blended learning is better than no learning for improving EBHC knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; and is better than face-to-face learning in improving attitudes and behaviour. Compared to pure e-learning, blended learning improves EBHC knowledge. It is not clear which elearning components are most effective in improving outcomes. However, the included studies were of moderate to low quality, with a small number of studies included in each analysis, and imprecision and inconsistency of results in all comparisons. These shortcomings need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autores :
Nkengafac Villyen Motaze;
Eva Rehfuess;
Taryn Young;
Anke Rohwer;
Autor corporativo:
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
Editores:
Otra ;
Signatura Topográfica:
1
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
Existencias:
147
Palabras claves:
E-learning
Systematicr Review
Evidence-based Health
Medical Education
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Resumen:
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and practice. Compared to no learning, pure e-learning improves EBHC knowledge and skills but not attitudes and behaviour. Pure e-learning is no better than face-to-face learning in improving any of the primary outcomes. Blended learning is better than no learning for improving EBHC knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; and is better than face-to-face learning in improving attitudes and behaviour. Compared to pure e-learning, blended learning improves EBHC knowledge. It is not clear which elearning components are most effective in improving outcomes. However, the included studies were of moderate to low quality, with a small number of studies included in each analysis, and imprecision and inconsistency of results in all comparisons. These shortcomings need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results
Autores:
Nkengafac Villyen Motaze
,
Eva Rehfuess
,
Taryn Young
,
Anke Rohwer
,
.
Titulo Revista:
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
.
Numero:
1
Volumen:
13
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Otra ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
1
Página Final:
147
ISBN:
1891-1803
Palabras claves:
E-learning
Systematicr Review
Evidence-based Health
Medical Education
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Otra :
E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Resumen:
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and practice. Compared to no learning, pure e-learning improves EBHC knowledge and skills but not attitudes and behaviour. Pure e-learning is no better than face-to-face learning in improving any of the primary outcomes. Blended learning is better than no learning for improving EBHC knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; and is better than face-to-face learning in improving attitudes and behaviour. Compared to pure e-learning, blended learning improves EBHC knowledge. It is not clear which elearning components are most effective in improving outcomes. However, the included studies were of moderate to low quality, with a small number of studies included in each analysis, and imprecision and inconsistency of results in all comparisons. These shortcomings need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results
Autores :
Nkengafac Villyen Motaze;
Eva Rehfuess;
Taryn Young;
Anke Rohwer;
Autor corporativo:
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Tipo :
Otra .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
E-learning
Systematicr Review
Evidence-based Health
Medical Education
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Otra :
E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Resumen:
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and practice. Compared to no learning, pure e-learning improves EBHC knowledge and skills but not attitudes and behaviour. Pure e-learning is no better than face-to-face learning in improving any of the primary outcomes. Blended learning is better than no learning for improving EBHC knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; and is better than face-to-face learning in improving attitudes and behaviour. Compared to pure e-learning, blended learning improves EBHC knowledge. It is not clear which elearning components are most effective in improving outcomes. However, the included studies were of moderate to low quality, with a small number of studies included in each analysis, and imprecision and inconsistency of results in all comparisons. These shortcomings need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results
Autores :
Nkengafac Villyen Motaze;
Eva Rehfuess;
Taryn Young;
Anke Rohwer;
Autor corporativo:
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Paginas:
1.
ISBN:
1891-1803.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
E-learning
Systematicr Review
Evidence-based Health
Medical Education
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review
Resumen:
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness of e-learning in improving evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and practice. Compared to no learning, pure e-learning improves EBHC knowledge and skills but not attitudes and behaviour. Pure e-learning is no better than face-to-face learning in improving any of the primary outcomes. Blended learning is better than no learning for improving EBHC knowledge, skills, attitude and behaviour; and is better than face-to-face learning in improving attitudes and behaviour. Compared to pure e-learning, blended learning improves EBHC knowledge. It is not clear which elearning components are most effective in improving outcomes. However, the included studies were of moderate to low quality, with a small number of studies included in each analysis, and imprecision and inconsistency of results in all comparisons. These shortcomings need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autor corporativo:
Campbell Systematic Reviews,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
E-learning
Systematicr Review
Evidence-based Health
Medical Education
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Nkengafac Villyen Motaze; E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review(2017). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=2047
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Nkengafac Villyen Motaze Eva Rehfuess Taryn Young Anke Rohwer Nkengafac Villyen Motaze Eva Rehfuess Taryn Young Anke Rohwer E-learning of evidence-based health care (EBHC) to increase EBHC competencies in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. 2017; 13Ed. 1.