Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey
Resumen:
With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail in 2022, uncertainty exists regarding how other residency application components, including research conducted during medical school, will inform interview and ranking decisions. The authors explore program director (PD) views on medical student research, the importance of disseminating that work, and the translatable skill set of research participation. Method: Surveys were distributed to all U.S. residency PDs and remained open from August to November 2021 to query the importance of research participation in assessing applicants, whether certain types of research were more valued, productivity measures that reflect meaningful research participation, and traits for which research serves as a proxy. The survey also queried whether research would be more important without a numeric Step 1 score and the importance of research vs other application components. Results: A total of 885 responses from 393 institutions were received. Ten PDs indicated that research is not considered when reviewing applicants, leaving 875 responses for analysis. Among 873 PDs (2 nonrespondents), 358 (41.0%) replied that meaningful research participation will be more important in offering interviews. A total of 164 of 304 most competitive specialties (53.9%) reported increased research importance compared with 99 of 282 competitive (35.1%) and 95 of 287 least competitive (33.1%) specialties. PDs reported that meaningful research participation demonstrated intellectual curiosity (545 [62.3%]), critical and analytical thinking skills (482 [55.1%]), and self-directed learning skills (455 [52.0%]). PDs from the most competitive specialties were significantly more likely to indicate that they value basic science research vs PDs from the least competitive specialties.
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Autores :
Fairchild Paige;
Bahner Ingrid;
Baxa Dwayne ;
Birnbaum Deborah ;
Chaudhry Sarwat ;
Chretien Katherine;
DeFranco Donald ;
Deptola Amber;
Wolfson Rachel ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Editores:
Otra ;
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
ISBN:
1938-808X
Existencias:
38
Palabras claves:
Residency Program
Medical Eduction
Medical Residents
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Evaluadores
Titulo Artículo:
Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey
Resumen:
With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail in 2022, uncertainty exists regarding how other residency application components, including research conducted during medical school, will inform interview and ranking decisions. The authors explore program director (PD) views on medical student research, the importance of disseminating that work, and the translatable skill set of research participation. Method: Surveys were distributed to all U.S. residency PDs and remained open from August to November 2021 to query the importance of research participation in assessing applicants, whether certain types of research were more valued, productivity measures that reflect meaningful research participation, and traits for which research serves as a proxy. The survey also queried whether research would be more important without a numeric Step 1 score and the importance of research vs other application components. Results: A total of 885 responses from 393 institutions were received. Ten PDs indicated that research is not considered when reviewing applicants, leaving 875 responses for analysis. Among 873 PDs (2 nonrespondents), 358 (41.0%) replied that meaningful research participation will be more important in offering interviews. A total of 164 of 304 most competitive specialties (53.9%) reported increased research importance compared with 99 of 282 competitive (35.1%) and 95 of 287 least competitive (33.1%) specialties. PDs reported that meaningful research participation demonstrated intellectual curiosity (545 [62.3%]), critical and analytical thinking skills (482 [55.1%]), and self-directed learning skills (455 [52.0%]). PDs from the most competitive specialties were significantly more likely to indicate that they value basic science research vs PDs from the least competitive specialties.
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Autores :
Fairchild Paige;
Bahner Ingrid;
Baxa Dwayne ;
Birnbaum Deborah ;
Chaudhry Sarwat ;
Chretien Katherine;
DeFranco Donald ;
Deptola Amber;
Wolfson Rachel ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Editores:
Otra ;
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
Existencias:
38
Palabras claves:
Residency Program
Medical Eduction
Medical Residents
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Evaluadores
Titulo Artículo:
Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey
Resumen:
With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail in 2022, uncertainty exists regarding how other residency application components, including research conducted during medical school, will inform interview and ranking decisions. The authors explore program director (PD) views on medical student research, the importance of disseminating that work, and the translatable skill set of research participation. Method: Surveys were distributed to all U.S. residency PDs and remained open from August to November 2021 to query the importance of research participation in assessing applicants, whether certain types of research were more valued, productivity measures that reflect meaningful research participation, and traits for which research serves as a proxy. The survey also queried whether research would be more important without a numeric Step 1 score and the importance of research vs other application components. Results: A total of 885 responses from 393 institutions were received. Ten PDs indicated that research is not considered when reviewing applicants, leaving 875 responses for analysis. Among 873 PDs (2 nonrespondents), 358 (41.0%) replied that meaningful research participation will be more important in offering interviews. A total of 164 of 304 most competitive specialties (53.9%) reported increased research importance compared with 99 of 282 competitive (35.1%) and 95 of 287 least competitive (33.1%) specialties. PDs reported that meaningful research participation demonstrated intellectual curiosity (545 [62.3%]), critical and analytical thinking skills (482 [55.1%]), and self-directed learning skills (455 [52.0%]). PDs from the most competitive specialties were significantly more likely to indicate that they value basic science research vs PDs from the least competitive specialties.
Autores:
Fairchild Paige
,
Bahner Ingrid
,
Baxa Dwayne
,
Birnbaum Deborah
,
Chaudhry Sarwat
,
Chretien Katherine
,
DeFranco Donald
,
Deptola Amber
,
Wolfson Rachel
,
.
Titulo Revista:
Academic Medicine ,
.
Numero:
Volumen:
0
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Otra ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
1
Página Final:
38
ISBN:
1938-808X
Palabras claves:
Residency Program
Medical Eduction
Medical Residents
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Evaluadores
Título Otra :
Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey
Resumen:
With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail in 2022, uncertainty exists regarding how other residency application components, including research conducted during medical school, will inform interview and ranking decisions. The authors explore program director (PD) views on medical student research, the importance of disseminating that work, and the translatable skill set of research participation. Method: Surveys were distributed to all U.S. residency PDs and remained open from August to November 2021 to query the importance of research participation in assessing applicants, whether certain types of research were more valued, productivity measures that reflect meaningful research participation, and traits for which research serves as a proxy. The survey also queried whether research would be more important without a numeric Step 1 score and the importance of research vs other application components. Results: A total of 885 responses from 393 institutions were received. Ten PDs indicated that research is not considered when reviewing applicants, leaving 875 responses for analysis. Among 873 PDs (2 nonrespondents), 358 (41.0%) replied that meaningful research participation will be more important in offering interviews. A total of 164 of 304 most competitive specialties (53.9%) reported increased research importance compared with 99 of 282 competitive (35.1%) and 95 of 287 least competitive (33.1%) specialties. PDs reported that meaningful research participation demonstrated intellectual curiosity (545 [62.3%]), critical and analytical thinking skills (482 [55.1%]), and self-directed learning skills (455 [52.0%]). PDs from the most competitive specialties were significantly more likely to indicate that they value basic science research vs PDs from the least competitive specialties.
Autores :
Fairchild Paige;
Bahner Ingrid;
Baxa Dwayne ;
Birnbaum Deborah ;
Chaudhry Sarwat ;
Chretien Katherine;
DeFranco Donald ;
Deptola Amber;
Wolfson Rachel ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Tipo :
Otra .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Residency Program
Medical Eduction
Medical Residents
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Evaluadores
Título Otra :
Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey
Resumen:
With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail in 2022, uncertainty exists regarding how other residency application components, including research conducted during medical school, will inform interview and ranking decisions. The authors explore program director (PD) views on medical student research, the importance of disseminating that work, and the translatable skill set of research participation. Method: Surveys were distributed to all U.S. residency PDs and remained open from August to November 2021 to query the importance of research participation in assessing applicants, whether certain types of research were more valued, productivity measures that reflect meaningful research participation, and traits for which research serves as a proxy. The survey also queried whether research would be more important without a numeric Step 1 score and the importance of research vs other application components. Results: A total of 885 responses from 393 institutions were received. Ten PDs indicated that research is not considered when reviewing applicants, leaving 875 responses for analysis. Among 873 PDs (2 nonrespondents), 358 (41.0%) replied that meaningful research participation will be more important in offering interviews. A total of 164 of 304 most competitive specialties (53.9%) reported increased research importance compared with 99 of 282 competitive (35.1%) and 95 of 287 least competitive (33.1%) specialties. PDs reported that meaningful research participation demonstrated intellectual curiosity (545 [62.3%]), critical and analytical thinking skills (482 [55.1%]), and self-directed learning skills (455 [52.0%]). PDs from the most competitive specialties were significantly more likely to indicate that they value basic science research vs PDs from the least competitive specialties.
Autores :
Fairchild Paige;
Bahner Ingrid;
Baxa Dwayne ;
Birnbaum Deborah ;
Chaudhry Sarwat ;
Chretien Katherine;
DeFranco Donald ;
Deptola Amber;
Wolfson Rachel ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Paginas:
1.
ISBN:
1938-808X .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Residency Program
Medical Eduction
Medical Residents
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Evaluadores
Titulo Artículo:
Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey
Resumen:
With the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 transition to pass/fail in 2022, uncertainty exists regarding how other residency application components, including research conducted during medical school, will inform interview and ranking decisions. The authors explore program director (PD) views on medical student research, the importance of disseminating that work, and the translatable skill set of research participation. Method: Surveys were distributed to all U.S. residency PDs and remained open from August to November 2021 to query the importance of research participation in assessing applicants, whether certain types of research were more valued, productivity measures that reflect meaningful research participation, and traits for which research serves as a proxy. The survey also queried whether research would be more important without a numeric Step 1 score and the importance of research vs other application components. Results: A total of 885 responses from 393 institutions were received. Ten PDs indicated that research is not considered when reviewing applicants, leaving 875 responses for analysis. Among 873 PDs (2 nonrespondents), 358 (41.0%) replied that meaningful research participation will be more important in offering interviews. A total of 164 of 304 most competitive specialties (53.9%) reported increased research importance compared with 99 of 282 competitive (35.1%) and 95 of 287 least competitive (33.1%) specialties. PDs reported that meaningful research participation demonstrated intellectual curiosity (545 [62.3%]), critical and analytical thinking skills (482 [55.1%]), and self-directed learning skills (455 [52.0%]). PDs from the most competitive specialties were significantly more likely to indicate that they value basic science research vs PDs from the least competitive specialties.
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Residency Program
Medical Eduction
Medical Residents
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Evaluadores
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Fairchild Paige; Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey(2023). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1996
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Fairchild Paige Bahner Ingrid Baxa Dwayne Birnbaum Deborah Chaudhry Sarwat Chretien Katherine DeFranco Donald Deptola Amber Wolfson Rachel Fairchild Paige Bahner Ingrid Baxa Dwayne Birnbaum Deborah Chaudhry Sarwat Chretien Katherine DeFranco Donald Deptola Amber Wolfson Rachel Residency Program Directors’ Views on Research Conducted During Medical School: A National Survey. 2023; 0Ed. 1.
