Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
“Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings
Resumen:
Problem During high-stakes committee meetings, bias is often expressed but goes uninterrupted because there is no formal structure to interrupt it. Bias impacts decision making and can further disadvantage those from backgrounds that have been marginalized. Approach The MD and MD–PhD admissions committees at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in NY in the 2020–2021 admissions season introduced a “Time-In” tool to interrupt bias during committee meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the “Time-In” tool on committee members’ perception of bias as a problem and the likelihood of committee members recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating others about bias after implementation. Outcomes There were 117 responses to the pre- and postseason surveys. In aggregate, respondents reported a statistically significant reduction in the perception of bias in the admissions process from preseason to postseason. There was no change in the likelihood of committee members in aggregate endorsing comfort in recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating about bias; however, notable gaps existed in the comfort of groups discussing bias publicly, i.e., respondents who are from backgrounds underrepresented in science and medicine, students, and new committee members were less comfortable than their comparators. By the postseason survey, these gaps were closed. Next Steps Implementing a “time-in” allows for interruption of bias, with an impact of reducing the perception of bias, empowering individuals, and reducing gaps among groups to discuss bias publicly. A “time-in” can profoundly impact decision-making bodies that are critical gatekeepers to the composition of the physician workforce. Future directions will focus on enhancing committee members’ skills in educating others about bias.
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Autores :
Maysonet Jessica;
Chudow, Jacquelyn;
Hess Leona;
Swartz Talia ;
Parkas Valerie ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Editores:
Otra ;
Signatura Topográfica:
5
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
580
ISBN:
1938-808X
Existencias:
584
Palabras claves:
Medical School
Medical Education
higher education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Titulo Artículo:
“Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings
Resumen:
Problem During high-stakes committee meetings, bias is often expressed but goes uninterrupted because there is no formal structure to interrupt it. Bias impacts decision making and can further disadvantage those from backgrounds that have been marginalized. Approach The MD and MD–PhD admissions committees at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in NY in the 2020–2021 admissions season introduced a “Time-In” tool to interrupt bias during committee meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the “Time-In” tool on committee members’ perception of bias as a problem and the likelihood of committee members recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating others about bias after implementation. Outcomes There were 117 responses to the pre- and postseason surveys. In aggregate, respondents reported a statistically significant reduction in the perception of bias in the admissions process from preseason to postseason. There was no change in the likelihood of committee members in aggregate endorsing comfort in recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating about bias; however, notable gaps existed in the comfort of groups discussing bias publicly, i.e., respondents who are from backgrounds underrepresented in science and medicine, students, and new committee members were less comfortable than their comparators. By the postseason survey, these gaps were closed. Next Steps Implementing a “time-in” allows for interruption of bias, with an impact of reducing the perception of bias, empowering individuals, and reducing gaps among groups to discuss bias publicly. A “time-in” can profoundly impact decision-making bodies that are critical gatekeepers to the composition of the physician workforce. Future directions will focus on enhancing committee members’ skills in educating others about bias.
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Autores :
Maysonet Jessica;
Chudow, Jacquelyn;
Hess Leona;
Swartz Talia ;
Parkas Valerie ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Editores:
Otra ;
Signatura Topográfica:
5
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
580
Existencias:
584
Palabras claves:
Medical School
Medical Education
higher education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Titulo Artículo:
“Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings
Resumen:
Problem During high-stakes committee meetings, bias is often expressed but goes uninterrupted because there is no formal structure to interrupt it. Bias impacts decision making and can further disadvantage those from backgrounds that have been marginalized. Approach The MD and MD–PhD admissions committees at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in NY in the 2020–2021 admissions season introduced a “Time-In” tool to interrupt bias during committee meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the “Time-In” tool on committee members’ perception of bias as a problem and the likelihood of committee members recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating others about bias after implementation. Outcomes There were 117 responses to the pre- and postseason surveys. In aggregate, respondents reported a statistically significant reduction in the perception of bias in the admissions process from preseason to postseason. There was no change in the likelihood of committee members in aggregate endorsing comfort in recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating about bias; however, notable gaps existed in the comfort of groups discussing bias publicly, i.e., respondents who are from backgrounds underrepresented in science and medicine, students, and new committee members were less comfortable than their comparators. By the postseason survey, these gaps were closed. Next Steps Implementing a “time-in” allows for interruption of bias, with an impact of reducing the perception of bias, empowering individuals, and reducing gaps among groups to discuss bias publicly. A “time-in” can profoundly impact decision-making bodies that are critical gatekeepers to the composition of the physician workforce. Future directions will focus on enhancing committee members’ skills in educating others about bias.
Autores:
Maysonet Jessica
,
Chudow, Jacquelyn
,
Hess Leona
,
Swartz Talia
,
Parkas Valerie
,
.
Titulo Revista:
Academic Medicine ,
.
Numero:
5
Volumen:
98
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Otra ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
580
Página Final:
584
ISBN:
1938-808X
Palabras claves:
Medical School
Medical Education
higher education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Título Otra :
“Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings
Resumen:
Problem During high-stakes committee meetings, bias is often expressed but goes uninterrupted because there is no formal structure to interrupt it. Bias impacts decision making and can further disadvantage those from backgrounds that have been marginalized. Approach The MD and MD–PhD admissions committees at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in NY in the 2020–2021 admissions season introduced a “Time-In” tool to interrupt bias during committee meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the “Time-In” tool on committee members’ perception of bias as a problem and the likelihood of committee members recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating others about bias after implementation. Outcomes There were 117 responses to the pre- and postseason surveys. In aggregate, respondents reported a statistically significant reduction in the perception of bias in the admissions process from preseason to postseason. There was no change in the likelihood of committee members in aggregate endorsing comfort in recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating about bias; however, notable gaps existed in the comfort of groups discussing bias publicly, i.e., respondents who are from backgrounds underrepresented in science and medicine, students, and new committee members were less comfortable than their comparators. By the postseason survey, these gaps were closed. Next Steps Implementing a “time-in” allows for interruption of bias, with an impact of reducing the perception of bias, empowering individuals, and reducing gaps among groups to discuss bias publicly. A “time-in” can profoundly impact decision-making bodies that are critical gatekeepers to the composition of the physician workforce. Future directions will focus on enhancing committee members’ skills in educating others about bias.
Autores :
Maysonet Jessica;
Chudow, Jacquelyn;
Hess Leona;
Swartz Talia ;
Parkas Valerie ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Tipo :
Otra .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Medical School
Medical Education
higher education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Título Otra :
“Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings
Resumen:
Problem During high-stakes committee meetings, bias is often expressed but goes uninterrupted because there is no formal structure to interrupt it. Bias impacts decision making and can further disadvantage those from backgrounds that have been marginalized. Approach The MD and MD–PhD admissions committees at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in NY in the 2020–2021 admissions season introduced a “Time-In” tool to interrupt bias during committee meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the “Time-In” tool on committee members’ perception of bias as a problem and the likelihood of committee members recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating others about bias after implementation. Outcomes There were 117 responses to the pre- and postseason surveys. In aggregate, respondents reported a statistically significant reduction in the perception of bias in the admissions process from preseason to postseason. There was no change in the likelihood of committee members in aggregate endorsing comfort in recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating about bias; however, notable gaps existed in the comfort of groups discussing bias publicly, i.e., respondents who are from backgrounds underrepresented in science and medicine, students, and new committee members were less comfortable than their comparators. By the postseason survey, these gaps were closed. Next Steps Implementing a “time-in” allows for interruption of bias, with an impact of reducing the perception of bias, empowering individuals, and reducing gaps among groups to discuss bias publicly. A “time-in” can profoundly impact decision-making bodies that are critical gatekeepers to the composition of the physician workforce. Future directions will focus on enhancing committee members’ skills in educating others about bias.
Autores :
Maysonet Jessica;
Chudow, Jacquelyn;
Hess Leona;
Swartz Talia ;
Parkas Valerie ;
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Paginas:
580.
ISBN:
1938-808X .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Medical School
Medical Education
higher education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Titulo Artículo:
“Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings
Resumen:
Problem During high-stakes committee meetings, bias is often expressed but goes uninterrupted because there is no formal structure to interrupt it. Bias impacts decision making and can further disadvantage those from backgrounds that have been marginalized. Approach The MD and MD–PhD admissions committees at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in NY in the 2020–2021 admissions season introduced a “Time-In” tool to interrupt bias during committee meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing the “Time-In” tool on committee members’ perception of bias as a problem and the likelihood of committee members recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating others about bias after implementation. Outcomes There were 117 responses to the pre- and postseason surveys. In aggregate, respondents reported a statistically significant reduction in the perception of bias in the admissions process from preseason to postseason. There was no change in the likelihood of committee members in aggregate endorsing comfort in recognizing, reporting, discussing, and educating about bias; however, notable gaps existed in the comfort of groups discussing bias publicly, i.e., respondents who are from backgrounds underrepresented in science and medicine, students, and new committee members were less comfortable than their comparators. By the postseason survey, these gaps were closed. Next Steps Implementing a “time-in” allows for interruption of bias, with an impact of reducing the perception of bias, empowering individuals, and reducing gaps among groups to discuss bias publicly. A “time-in” can profoundly impact decision-making bodies that are critical gatekeepers to the composition of the physician workforce. Future directions will focus on enhancing committee members’ skills in educating others about bias.
Fecha de publicación:
2023.
Autor corporativo:
Academic Medicine ,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Medical School
Medical Education
higher education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Maysonet Jessica; “Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings(2023). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1995
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Maysonet Jessica Chudow, Jacquelyn Hess Leona Swartz Talia Parkas Valerie Maysonet Jessica Chudow, Jacquelyn Hess Leona Swartz Talia Parkas Valerie “Time-In”: A Tool for Interrupting Bias in Medical School Admissions Committee Meetings. 2023; 98Ed. 580.
