Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio1.12, 95% CI1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autores :
Azusa Maeda ;
Timothy D. Jackson;
Aristithes G. Doumouras ;
Autor corporativo:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,
Editores:
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) ;
Signatura Topográfica:
12
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1997
ISBN:
1550-7289
Existencias:
2003
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Surgery Accreditation
Bariatric Surgery
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Decanatura
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio1.12, 95% CI1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autores :
Azusa Maeda ;
Timothy D. Jackson;
Aristithes G. Doumouras ;
Autor corporativo:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,
Editores:
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) ;
Signatura Topográfica:
12
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1997
Existencias:
2003
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Surgery Accreditation
Bariatric Surgery
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Decanatura
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio1.12, 95% CI1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Autores:
Azusa Maeda
,
Timothy D. Jackson
,
Aristithes G. Doumouras
,
.
Titulo Revista:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,
.
Numero:
12
Volumen:
13
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
1997
Página Final:
2003
ISBN:
1550-7289
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Surgery Accreditation
Bariatric Surgery
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Decanatura
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) :
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio1.12, 95% CI1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Autores :
Azusa Maeda ;
Timothy D. Jackson;
Aristithes G. Doumouras ;
Autor corporativo:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Tipo :
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Surgery Accreditation
Bariatric Surgery
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Decanatura
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) :
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio1.12, 95% CI1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Autores :
Azusa Maeda ;
Timothy D. Jackson;
Aristithes G. Doumouras ;
Autor corporativo:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Paginas:
1997.
ISBN:
1550-7289.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Surgery Accreditation
Bariatric Surgery
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Decanatura
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study
Resumen:
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery. SETTING: This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. METHODS: Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio1.12, 95% CI1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autor corporativo:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Surgery Accreditation
Bariatric Surgery
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Decanatura
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Azusa Maeda ; The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study(2017). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1889
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Azusa Maeda Timothy D. Jackson Aristithes G. Doumouras Azusa Maeda Timothy D. Jackson Aristithes G. Doumouras The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study. 2017; 13Ed. 1997.
