Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.
Resumen:
Objective To explore how organizations respond to and interact with the accreditation process and the actual and potential mechanisms through which accreditation may influence quality. Design Qualitative grounded theory study. Setting Organizations who had participated in Accreditation Canada’s Qmentum program during January 2014–June 2016. Participants Individuals who had coordinated the accreditation process or were involved in managing or promoting quality. Results The accreditation process is largely viewed as a quality assurance process, which often feeds in to quality improvement activities if the feedback aligns with organizational priorities. Three key stages are required for accreditation to impact quality: coherence, organizational buy-in and organizational action. These stages map to constructs outlined in Normalization Process Theory. Coherence is established when an organization and its staff perceive that accreditation aligns with the organization’s beliefs, context and model of service delivery. Organizational buy-in is established when there is both a conceptual champion and an operational champion, and is influenced by both internal and external contextual factors. Quality improvement action occurs when organizations take purposeful action in response to observations, feedback or self-reflection resulting from the accreditation process. Conclusions The accreditation process has the potential to influence quality through a series of three mechanisms: coherence, organizational buy-in and collective quality improvement action. Internal and external contextual factors, including individual characteristics, influence an organization’s experience of accreditation.
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autores :
N M Ivers;
J I Mitchell;
J Shaw;
L Desveaux;
Autor corporativo:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,,
Editores:
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) ;
Signatura Topográfica:
7
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
941
ISBN:
1464-3677
Existencias:
947
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Quality Management
Qualitative Methods
Público objetivo:
Decanatura
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.
Resumen:
Objective To explore how organizations respond to and interact with the accreditation process and the actual and potential mechanisms through which accreditation may influence quality. Design Qualitative grounded theory study. Setting Organizations who had participated in Accreditation Canada’s Qmentum program during January 2014–June 2016. Participants Individuals who had coordinated the accreditation process or were involved in managing or promoting quality. Results The accreditation process is largely viewed as a quality assurance process, which often feeds in to quality improvement activities if the feedback aligns with organizational priorities. Three key stages are required for accreditation to impact quality: coherence, organizational buy-in and organizational action. These stages map to constructs outlined in Normalization Process Theory. Coherence is established when an organization and its staff perceive that accreditation aligns with the organization’s beliefs, context and model of service delivery. Organizational buy-in is established when there is both a conceptual champion and an operational champion, and is influenced by both internal and external contextual factors. Quality improvement action occurs when organizations take purposeful action in response to observations, feedback or self-reflection resulting from the accreditation process. Conclusions The accreditation process has the potential to influence quality through a series of three mechanisms: coherence, organizational buy-in and collective quality improvement action. Internal and external contextual factors, including individual characteristics, influence an organization’s experience of accreditation.
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autores :
N M Ivers;
J I Mitchell;
J Shaw;
L Desveaux;
Autor corporativo:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,,
Editores:
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) ;
Signatura Topográfica:
7
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
941
Existencias:
947
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Quality Management
Qualitative Methods
Público objetivo:
Decanatura
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.
Resumen:
Objective To explore how organizations respond to and interact with the accreditation process and the actual and potential mechanisms through which accreditation may influence quality. Design Qualitative grounded theory study. Setting Organizations who had participated in Accreditation Canada’s Qmentum program during January 2014–June 2016. Participants Individuals who had coordinated the accreditation process or were involved in managing or promoting quality. Results The accreditation process is largely viewed as a quality assurance process, which often feeds in to quality improvement activities if the feedback aligns with organizational priorities. Three key stages are required for accreditation to impact quality: coherence, organizational buy-in and organizational action. These stages map to constructs outlined in Normalization Process Theory. Coherence is established when an organization and its staff perceive that accreditation aligns with the organization’s beliefs, context and model of service delivery. Organizational buy-in is established when there is both a conceptual champion and an operational champion, and is influenced by both internal and external contextual factors. Quality improvement action occurs when organizations take purposeful action in response to observations, feedback or self-reflection resulting from the accreditation process. Conclusions The accreditation process has the potential to influence quality through a series of three mechanisms: coherence, organizational buy-in and collective quality improvement action. Internal and external contextual factors, including individual characteristics, influence an organization’s experience of accreditation.
Autores:
N M Ivers
,
J I Mitchell
,
J Shaw
,
L Desveaux
,
.
Titulo Revista:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,,
.
Numero:
7
Volumen:
29
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
941
Página Final:
947
ISBN:
1464-3677
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Quality Management
Qualitative Methods
Público objetivo:
Decanatura
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Título Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) :
Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.
Resumen:
Objective To explore how organizations respond to and interact with the accreditation process and the actual and potential mechanisms through which accreditation may influence quality. Design Qualitative grounded theory study. Setting Organizations who had participated in Accreditation Canada’s Qmentum program during January 2014–June 2016. Participants Individuals who had coordinated the accreditation process or were involved in managing or promoting quality. Results The accreditation process is largely viewed as a quality assurance process, which often feeds in to quality improvement activities if the feedback aligns with organizational priorities. Three key stages are required for accreditation to impact quality: coherence, organizational buy-in and organizational action. These stages map to constructs outlined in Normalization Process Theory. Coherence is established when an organization and its staff perceive that accreditation aligns with the organization’s beliefs, context and model of service delivery. Organizational buy-in is established when there is both a conceptual champion and an operational champion, and is influenced by both internal and external contextual factors. Quality improvement action occurs when organizations take purposeful action in response to observations, feedback or self-reflection resulting from the accreditation process. Conclusions The accreditation process has the potential to influence quality through a series of three mechanisms: coherence, organizational buy-in and collective quality improvement action. Internal and external contextual factors, including individual characteristics, influence an organization’s experience of accreditation.
Autores :
N M Ivers;
J I Mitchell;
J Shaw;
L Desveaux;
Autor corporativo:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,,
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Tipo :
Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Quality Management
Qualitative Methods
Público objetivo:
Decanatura
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Título Biblioteca Virtual en Salud(BVS) :
Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.
Resumen:
Objective To explore how organizations respond to and interact with the accreditation process and the actual and potential mechanisms through which accreditation may influence quality. Design Qualitative grounded theory study. Setting Organizations who had participated in Accreditation Canada’s Qmentum program during January 2014–June 2016. Participants Individuals who had coordinated the accreditation process or were involved in managing or promoting quality. Results The accreditation process is largely viewed as a quality assurance process, which often feeds in to quality improvement activities if the feedback aligns with organizational priorities. Three key stages are required for accreditation to impact quality: coherence, organizational buy-in and organizational action. These stages map to constructs outlined in Normalization Process Theory. Coherence is established when an organization and its staff perceive that accreditation aligns with the organization’s beliefs, context and model of service delivery. Organizational buy-in is established when there is both a conceptual champion and an operational champion, and is influenced by both internal and external contextual factors. Quality improvement action occurs when organizations take purposeful action in response to observations, feedback or self-reflection resulting from the accreditation process. Conclusions The accreditation process has the potential to influence quality through a series of three mechanisms: coherence, organizational buy-in and collective quality improvement action. Internal and external contextual factors, including individual characteristics, influence an organization’s experience of accreditation.
Autores :
N M Ivers;
J I Mitchell;
J Shaw;
L Desveaux;
Autor corporativo:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,,
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Paginas:
941.
ISBN:
1464-3677.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Quality Management
Qualitative Methods
Público objetivo:
Decanatura
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.
Resumen:
Objective To explore how organizations respond to and interact with the accreditation process and the actual and potential mechanisms through which accreditation may influence quality. Design Qualitative grounded theory study. Setting Organizations who had participated in Accreditation Canada’s Qmentum program during January 2014–June 2016. Participants Individuals who had coordinated the accreditation process or were involved in managing or promoting quality. Results The accreditation process is largely viewed as a quality assurance process, which often feeds in to quality improvement activities if the feedback aligns with organizational priorities. Three key stages are required for accreditation to impact quality: coherence, organizational buy-in and organizational action. These stages map to constructs outlined in Normalization Process Theory. Coherence is established when an organization and its staff perceive that accreditation aligns with the organization’s beliefs, context and model of service delivery. Organizational buy-in is established when there is both a conceptual champion and an operational champion, and is influenced by both internal and external contextual factors. Quality improvement action occurs when organizations take purposeful action in response to observations, feedback or self-reflection resulting from the accreditation process. Conclusions The accreditation process has the potential to influence quality through a series of three mechanisms: coherence, organizational buy-in and collective quality improvement action. Internal and external contextual factors, including individual characteristics, influence an organization’s experience of accreditation.
Fecha de publicación:
2017.
Autor corporativo:
International Journal for Quality in Health Care,,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Accreditation
Quality Management
Qualitative Methods
Público objetivo:
Decanatura
Docentes
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :N M Ivers; Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.(2017). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1888
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
N M Ivers J I Mitchell J Shaw L Desveaux N M Ivers J I Mitchell J Shaw L Desveaux Understanding the impact of accreditation on quality in healthcare: A grounded theory approach.. 2017; 29Ed. 941.
