Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?
Resumen:
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether junior surgical residents had successfully mastered bladder catheterization. Our hypothesis was that surgical residents would be overly confident in their abilities and underestimate the potential for case complexity. Materials and methods: PGY 2–4 surgery residents (n = 44) were given 15 min. to complete three of four bladder catheterization simulations. Participants reported their mastery by rating confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of procedure performance. Results: Participants made a total of 228 errors with an average of 5.1 errors (standard deviation = 2.6) per participant. The most common errors included not maintaining the sterile field (52.0%), failure to get urine return (20.3%), and inflating the catheter balloon before urine return (8.4%). Some residents committed the same error more than once. Presimulation confidence ratings ranged from “1” being not confident to “5” being extremely confident. Average presimulation confidence was 4.42 (range 1–5, standard deviation = 0.85). Sixteen (36%) residents ranked their presimulation confidence in problem-solving abilities as “moderately confident” or below, whereas 28 (64%) were “very confident” or above. The lower the resident’s presimulation confidence in problem-solving, the more errors they committed during the simulation (beta = −0.33, t = −2.15, P = −0.04).
Fecha de publicación:
2016.
Autores :
Rebecca D. Ray;
Jay N. Nathwani;
Rebekah M. Fiers;
Carla M. Pugh;
Bridget R. O’Connell-Long;
Autor corporativo:
The Journal of surgical research,
Editores:
Medline-PubMed ;
Editorial:
1,
Signatura Topográfica:
1
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
27
ISBN:
1095-8673
Existencias:
31
Palabras claves:
Simulation
Performance
Confidence
Surgery
Education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?
Resumen:
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether junior surgical residents had successfully mastered bladder catheterization. Our hypothesis was that surgical residents would be overly confident in their abilities and underestimate the potential for case complexity. Materials and methods: PGY 2–4 surgery residents (n = 44) were given 15 min. to complete three of four bladder catheterization simulations. Participants reported their mastery by rating confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of procedure performance. Results: Participants made a total of 228 errors with an average of 5.1 errors (standard deviation = 2.6) per participant. The most common errors included not maintaining the sterile field (52.0%), failure to get urine return (20.3%), and inflating the catheter balloon before urine return (8.4%). Some residents committed the same error more than once. Presimulation confidence ratings ranged from “1” being not confident to “5” being extremely confident. Average presimulation confidence was 4.42 (range 1–5, standard deviation = 0.85). Sixteen (36%) residents ranked their presimulation confidence in problem-solving abilities as “moderately confident” or below, whereas 28 (64%) were “very confident” or above. The lower the resident’s presimulation confidence in problem-solving, the more errors they committed during the simulation (beta = −0.33, t = −2.15, P = −0.04).
Fecha de publicación:
2016.
Autores :
Rebecca D. Ray;
Jay N. Nathwani;
Rebekah M. Fiers;
Carla M. Pugh;
Bridget R. O’Connell-Long;
Autor corporativo:
The Journal of surgical research,
Editores:
Medline-PubMed ;
Editorial:
1,
Signatura Topográfica:
1
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
27
Existencias:
31
Palabras claves:
Simulation
Performance
Confidence
Surgery
Education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?
Resumen:
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether junior surgical residents had successfully mastered bladder catheterization. Our hypothesis was that surgical residents would be overly confident in their abilities and underestimate the potential for case complexity. Materials and methods: PGY 2–4 surgery residents (n = 44) were given 15 min. to complete three of four bladder catheterization simulations. Participants reported their mastery by rating confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of procedure performance. Results: Participants made a total of 228 errors with an average of 5.1 errors (standard deviation = 2.6) per participant. The most common errors included not maintaining the sterile field (52.0%), failure to get urine return (20.3%), and inflating the catheter balloon before urine return (8.4%). Some residents committed the same error more than once. Presimulation confidence ratings ranged from “1” being not confident to “5” being extremely confident. Average presimulation confidence was 4.42 (range 1–5, standard deviation = 0.85). Sixteen (36%) residents ranked their presimulation confidence in problem-solving abilities as “moderately confident” or below, whereas 28 (64%) were “very confident” or above. The lower the resident’s presimulation confidence in problem-solving, the more errors they committed during the simulation (beta = −0.33, t = −2.15, P = −0.04).
Autores:
Rebecca D. Ray
,
Jay N. Nathwani
,
Rebekah M. Fiers
,
Carla M. Pugh
,
Bridget R. O’Connell-Long
,
.
Titulo Revista:
The Journal of surgical research,
.
Numero:
1
Volumen:
206
Fecha de publicación:
2016.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Medline-PubMed ,
.
Suplemento:
1.
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
27
Página Final:
31
ISBN:
1095-8673
Palabras claves:
Simulation
Performance
Confidence
Surgery
Education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Medline-PubMed :
Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?
Resumen:
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether junior surgical residents had successfully mastered bladder catheterization. Our hypothesis was that surgical residents would be overly confident in their abilities and underestimate the potential for case complexity. Materials and methods: PGY 2–4 surgery residents (n = 44) were given 15 min. to complete three of four bladder catheterization simulations. Participants reported their mastery by rating confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of procedure performance. Results: Participants made a total of 228 errors with an average of 5.1 errors (standard deviation = 2.6) per participant. The most common errors included not maintaining the sterile field (52.0%), failure to get urine return (20.3%), and inflating the catheter balloon before urine return (8.4%). Some residents committed the same error more than once. Presimulation confidence ratings ranged from “1” being not confident to “5” being extremely confident. Average presimulation confidence was 4.42 (range 1–5, standard deviation = 0.85). Sixteen (36%) residents ranked their presimulation confidence in problem-solving abilities as “moderately confident” or below, whereas 28 (64%) were “very confident” or above. The lower the resident’s presimulation confidence in problem-solving, the more errors they committed during the simulation (beta = −0.33, t = −2.15, P = −0.04).
Autores :
Rebecca D. Ray;
Jay N. Nathwani;
Rebekah M. Fiers;
Carla M. Pugh;
Bridget R. O’Connell-Long;
Autor corporativo:
The Journal of surgical research,
Fecha de publicación:
2016.
Tipo :
Medline-PubMed .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Simulation
Performance
Confidence
Surgery
Education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Medline-PubMed :
Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?
Resumen:
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether junior surgical residents had successfully mastered bladder catheterization. Our hypothesis was that surgical residents would be overly confident in their abilities and underestimate the potential for case complexity. Materials and methods: PGY 2–4 surgery residents (n = 44) were given 15 min. to complete three of four bladder catheterization simulations. Participants reported their mastery by rating confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of procedure performance. Results: Participants made a total of 228 errors with an average of 5.1 errors (standard deviation = 2.6) per participant. The most common errors included not maintaining the sterile field (52.0%), failure to get urine return (20.3%), and inflating the catheter balloon before urine return (8.4%). Some residents committed the same error more than once. Presimulation confidence ratings ranged from “1” being not confident to “5” being extremely confident. Average presimulation confidence was 4.42 (range 1–5, standard deviation = 0.85). Sixteen (36%) residents ranked their presimulation confidence in problem-solving abilities as “moderately confident” or below, whereas 28 (64%) were “very confident” or above. The lower the resident’s presimulation confidence in problem-solving, the more errors they committed during the simulation (beta = −0.33, t = −2.15, P = −0.04).
Autores :
Rebecca D. Ray;
Jay N. Nathwani;
Rebekah M. Fiers;
Carla M. Pugh;
Bridget R. O’Connell-Long;
Autor corporativo:
The Journal of surgical research,
Fecha de publicación:
2016.
Paginas:
27.
ISBN:
1095-8673.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Simulation
Performance
Confidence
Surgery
Education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?
Resumen:
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate whether junior surgical residents had successfully mastered bladder catheterization. Our hypothesis was that surgical residents would be overly confident in their abilities and underestimate the potential for case complexity. Materials and methods: PGY 2–4 surgery residents (n = 44) were given 15 min. to complete three of four bladder catheterization simulations. Participants reported their mastery by rating confidence using a 5-point Likert scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to test predictors of procedure performance. Results: Participants made a total of 228 errors with an average of 5.1 errors (standard deviation = 2.6) per participant. The most common errors included not maintaining the sterile field (52.0%), failure to get urine return (20.3%), and inflating the catheter balloon before urine return (8.4%). Some residents committed the same error more than once. Presimulation confidence ratings ranged from “1” being not confident to “5” being extremely confident. Average presimulation confidence was 4.42 (range 1–5, standard deviation = 0.85). Sixteen (36%) residents ranked their presimulation confidence in problem-solving abilities as “moderately confident” or below, whereas 28 (64%) were “very confident” or above. The lower the resident’s presimulation confidence in problem-solving, the more errors they committed during the simulation (beta = −0.33, t = −2.15, P = −0.04).
Fecha de publicación:
2016.
Autor corporativo:
The Journal of surgical research,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Simulation
Performance
Confidence
Surgery
Education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Medicos
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Rebecca D. Ray; Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?(2016). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1780
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Rebecca D. Ray Jay N. Nathwani Rebekah M. Fiers Carla M. Pugh Bridget R. O’Connell-Long Rebecca D. Ray Jay N. Nathwani Rebekah M. Fiers Carla M. Pugh Bridget R. O’Connell-Long Errors in bladder catheterization: are residents ready for complex scenarios?. 1: 2016; 206Ed. 27.
