Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
Resumen:
Purpose: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. Results: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on- treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow- up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Autores :
Ritchell van Dams;
Eric M. Chang;
Neil R. Parikh;
Rebecca G. Philipson;
John V. Hegde;
Amar U. Kishan;
Tania B. Kaprealian;
Ting Martin Ma;
Autor corporativo:
Advances in Radiation Oncology ,
Editores:
Medline-PubMed ;
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
ISBN:
24521094
Existencias:
11
Palabras claves:
Telemedicine
Post-COVID-19
Oncology
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
Resumen:
Purpose: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. Results: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on- treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow- up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Autores :
Ritchell van Dams;
Eric M. Chang;
Neil R. Parikh;
Rebecca G. Philipson;
John V. Hegde;
Amar U. Kishan;
Tania B. Kaprealian;
Ting Martin Ma;
Autor corporativo:
Advances in Radiation Oncology ,
Editores:
Medline-PubMed ;
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
Existencias:
11
Palabras claves:
Telemedicine
Post-COVID-19
Oncology
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
Resumen:
Purpose: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. Results: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on- treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow- up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.
Autores:
Ritchell van Dams
,
Eric M. Chang
,
Neil R. Parikh
,
Rebecca G. Philipson
,
John V. Hegde
,
Amar U. Kishan
,
Tania B. Kaprealian
,
Ting Martin Ma
,
.
Titulo Revista:
Advances in Radiation Oncology ,
.
Numero:
Volumen:
0
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
Medline-PubMed ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
1
Página Final:
11
ISBN:
24521094
Palabras claves:
Telemedicine
Post-COVID-19
Oncology
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Medline-PubMed :
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
Resumen:
Purpose: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. Results: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on- treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow- up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.
Autores :
Ritchell van Dams;
Eric M. Chang;
Neil R. Parikh;
Rebecca G. Philipson;
John V. Hegde;
Amar U. Kishan;
Tania B. Kaprealian;
Ting Martin Ma;
Autor corporativo:
Advances in Radiation Oncology ,
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Tipo :
Medline-PubMed .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Telemedicine
Post-COVID-19
Oncology
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título Medline-PubMed :
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
Resumen:
Purpose: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. Results: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on- treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow- up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.
Autores :
Ritchell van Dams;
Eric M. Chang;
Neil R. Parikh;
Rebecca G. Philipson;
John V. Hegde;
Amar U. Kishan;
Tania B. Kaprealian;
Ting Martin Ma;
Autor corporativo:
Advances in Radiation Oncology ,
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Paginas:
1.
ISBN:
24521094.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Telemedicine
Post-COVID-19
Oncology
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19
Resumen:
Purpose: We sought to survey the attitudes and perceptions of US radiation oncologists toward the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer suggestions for its integration in the postpandemic era. Methods and Materials: A 25-question, anonymous online survey was distributed nationwide to radiation oncologists. Results: One hundred and twenty-one respondents completed the survey, with 92% from academia. Overall, 79% worked at institutions that had implemented a work-from-home policy, with which 74% were satisfied. Despite nearly all visit types being conducted in-person before COVID-19, 25%, 41%, and 5% of the respondents used telemedicine for more than half of their new consultations, follow-up, and on- treatment visits, respectively, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most (83%) reported being comfortable integrating telemedicine. Although telemedicine was appreciated as being more convenient for patients (97%) and reducing transmission of infectious agents (83%), the most commonly perceived disadvantages were difficulty in performing physical examinations (90%), patients’ inability to use technology adequately (74%), and technical malfunctions (72%). Compared with in-person visits, telemedicine was felt to be inferior in establishing a personal connection during consultation (90%) and assessing for toxicity while on-treatment (88%) and during follow-up (70%). For follow- up visits, genitourinary and thoracic were perceived as most appropriate for telemedicine while gynecologic and head and neck were considered the least appropriate. Overall, 70% were in favor of more telemedicine, even after pandemic is over.
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Autor corporativo:
Advances in Radiation Oncology ,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
Telemedicine
Post-COVID-19
Oncology
Público objetivo:
Posgrado
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Ritchell van Dams; Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19(2022). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1588
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Ritchell van Dams Eric M. Chang Neil R. Parikh Rebecca G. Philipson John V. Hegde Amar U. Kishan Tania B. Kaprealian Ting Martin Ma Ritchell van Dams Eric M. Chang Neil R. Parikh Rebecca G. Philipson John V. Hegde Amar U. Kishan Tania B. Kaprealian Ting Martin Ma Experience of Telemedicine Visits in Radiation Oncology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A US National Survey and Lessons Learned for Incorporating Telemedicine Post-COVID-19. 2022; 0Ed. 1.
