Volver al buscador
Vista en detalle del documento
Titulo Artículo:
A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
Resumen:
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Autores :
Stephen O'Neill;
Mark O'Donnell;
Roy Spence;
Lauren Hackney;
Autor corporativo:
The Surgeon,
Editores:
ScienceDirect ;
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
ISBN:
2405-5840
Existencias:
10
Palabras claves:
General surgery
Surgical training
Surgical registrar
Medical education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
Resumen:
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Autores :
Stephen O'Neill;
Mark O'Donnell;
Roy Spence;
Lauren Hackney;
Autor corporativo:
The Surgeon,
Editores:
ScienceDirect ;
Idioma:
Inglés
Páginas:
1
Existencias:
10
Palabras claves:
General surgery
Surgical training
Surgical registrar
Medical education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
Resumen:
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods
Autores:
Stephen O'Neill
,
Mark O'Donnell
,
Roy Spence
,
Lauren Hackney
,
.
Titulo Revista:
The Surgeon,
.
Numero:
Volumen:
30
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Base de Datos Bibliográfica:
ScienceDirect ,
.
Suplemento:
Idioma:
Inglés
Página Inicial:
1
Página Final:
10
ISBN:
2405-5840
Palabras claves:
General surgery
Surgical training
Surgical registrar
Medical education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título ScienceDirect :
A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
Resumen:
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods
Autores :
Stephen O'Neill;
Mark O'Donnell;
Roy Spence;
Lauren Hackney;
Autor corporativo:
The Surgeon,
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Tipo :
ScienceDirect .
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
General surgery
Surgical training
Surgical registrar
Medical education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Título ScienceDirect :
A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
Resumen:
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods
Autores :
Stephen O'Neill;
Mark O'Donnell;
Roy Spence;
Lauren Hackney;
Autor corporativo:
The Surgeon,
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Paginas:
1.
ISBN:
2405-5840.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
General surgery
Surgical training
Surgical registrar
Medical education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Titulo Artículo:
A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
Resumen:
Background: Only rigorous evaluation of competence will result in the production of safe surgeons that are able to provide the best care for patients. The development of competency-based assessment should ultimately be evidence driven. Objectives: Explore the volume of existing evidence pertaining to the different objective assessment methods reported in the literature. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing objective assessment of postgraduate general surgical trainees within the last 20 years. Sources of evidence: PubMed, Ovid Medline and Web of Sciences. Charting methods: A data chart proforma was designed and data were extracted into tables. Basic numerical analysis of extracted data and narrative synthesis of charted data. Results: A total of 343 papers were reviewed. 26 were eligible for inclusion. 92% of articles were published from 2008 onwards. 50% have been published in the last five years. The articles originated from 6 different countries, predominantly the United Kingdom (42%), followed by the United States of America (38%). In addition, a small number were published from Canada (8%), Japan (4%), Germany (4%) and Australia (4%). UK publications were predominantly between 2008 and 2014 while the USA had a later predominance between 2015 and 2018. 42% were based on quantitative methodology, 27% had a qualitative approach while 31% had mixed analysis. There were sixteen assessment methods pre- sented. The most common type of assessment was Objective Structured Assessments (27%), which included Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) (23%) and Objective Structured Assessment of Non-Technical Skill (4%). Procedure Based Assessment (PBA) (23%) and Entrustability Scales (23%) were also prevalent. Conclusions: This scoping review has identified a range of different assessment methods. The assessment methods with a higher volume and level of supporting evidence were OSATS, PBAs and Entrustability Scales. There was a lower volume and level of supporting evidence found within this review for the remaining assessment methods
Fecha de publicación:
2022.
Autor corporativo:
The Surgeon,
.
Idioma:
Inglés
Palabras claves:
General surgery
Surgical training
Surgical registrar
Medical education
Público objetivo:
Docentes
Investigadores
Educadores Medicos
Citar
Enviar por correo electrónico
Imprimir
Guardar
Consultar
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA ENVIAR EL CORREO
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Su correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Correo electrónico destino:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Hola, encontré este documento en la biblioteca especializada en Educación Médica de ASCOFAME :Stephen O'Neill; A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees(2022). Podras consultarlo en el Siguiente link: https://ascofame.org.co/biblioteca/detalle_documento.php?id=1561
INGRESE LOS SIGUIENTES DATOS
PARA RESERVA EN SALA
Sus nombres:
Sus apellidos:
Correo electrónico:
Se necesita un valor.
Formato no válido.
Inscribirme al e-boletin de ASCOFAME
Programar la fecha de su visita:
Programar la hora de su visita:
7:00 AM
8:00 AM
9:00 AM
10:00 AM
11:00 AM
12:00 M
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
3:00 PM
¿Cómo citar este documento?
Seleccionar y copiar el texto.
Stephen O'Neill Mark O'Donnell Roy Spence Lauren Hackney Stephen O'Neill Mark O'Donnell Roy Spence Lauren Hackney A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees. 2022; 30Ed. 1.
